2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1985 Volvo 245
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1985 Volvo 245. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1985 Volvo 245.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Volvo 245. (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Volvo 245.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1985 Volvo 245 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | CTS | 245 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2660 mm |