2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1986 Mazda 929
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 595 kg more than 1986 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1986 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | CTS | 929 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5664 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2620 mm |