2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1986 Renault 21
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault 21 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP) has 193 more horse power than 1986 Renault 21. (66 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault 21.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Renault 21, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault 21. (126 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault 21.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1986 Renault 21 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | CTS | 21 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2068 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 259 HP | 66 HP |
| Torque | 253 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 89 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
