2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1987 Chrysler Conquest
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Chrysler Conquest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Chrysler Conquest would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1987 Chrysler Conquest. (185 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1987 Chrysler Conquest.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Chrysler Conquest, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Chrysler Conquest (318 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1987 Chrysler Conquest will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1987 Chrysler Conquest | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | CTS | Conquest |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 259 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 253 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
