2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1987 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 155 kg more than 1987 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1987 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | CTS | Cougar |
Year Released | 2009 | 1987 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2650 mm |