2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1991 Honda CRX
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Honda CRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Honda CRX would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1991 Honda CRX. (150 HP @ 7600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1991 Honda CRX.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Honda CRX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Honda CRX. (121 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Honda CRX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1991 Honda CRX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | CTS | CRX |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1991 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 259 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 7600 RPM |
| Torque | 253 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 84.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
