2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1991 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 2 kg more than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1991 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
Model | CTS | Continental |
Year Released | 2009 | 1991 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 304 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1638 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2780 mm |