2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1992 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1992 Mazda RX-7. (239 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1992 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1992 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | CTS | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 259 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |