2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1992 Opel Omega
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1992 Opel Omega has manual transmission. 1992 Opel Omega will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1992 Opel Omega | |
Make | Cadillac | Opel |
Model | CTS | Omega |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 2408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2740 mm |