2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 918 kg more than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (232 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | CTS | 100 1.4 D |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1358 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 232 Nm | 89 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 70.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 81.3 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
