2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan AA-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan AA-X would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan AA-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS | AA-X |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 259 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |