2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1996 Fiat Armadillo
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Armadillo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Armadillo would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 416 kg more than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (200 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. 1996 Fiat Armadillo has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Fiat Armadillo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1996 Fiat Armadillo | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | CTS | Armadillo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3175 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 200 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1374 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 1850 mm |