2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1996 Fiat Palio
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Palio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Palio would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Palio. (60 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Palio.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Palio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Palio. (80 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Palio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1996 Fiat Palio | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | CTS | Palio |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 259 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 253 Nm | 80 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 54.8 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
