2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1996 Mazda MS-8
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MS-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MS-8 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 510 kg more than 1996 Mazda MS-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1996 Mazda MS-8 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | CTS | MS-8 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3175 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1760 mm |
