2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1997 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1997 Chevrolet Astro. (183 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1997 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1997 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1997 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | CTS | Astro |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 259 HP | 183 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 253 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 101.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 88.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
