2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1998 Citroen Saxo

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Citroen Saxo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Citroen Saxo would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1998 Citroen Saxo. (117 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen Saxo.

Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen Saxo. (145 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen Saxo.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac CTS 1998 Citroen Saxo
Make Cadillac Citroen
Model CTS Saxo
Year Released 2009 1998
Body Type Station Wagon Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3564 cc 1586 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 259 HP 117 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6600 RPM
Torque 253 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 3100 RPM 5200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 94 mm 78.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85 mm 82 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 10.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors