2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1999 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1999 Cadillac DeVille. (271 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1999 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 40 kg more than 1999 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1999 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | CTS | DeVille |
Year Released | 2009 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5664 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1950 mm |