2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 535 kg more than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (370 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS | Econoline |
Year Released | 2009 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 304 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 370 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3510 mm |