2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (253 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS | C 52 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 259 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 354 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |