2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Chevrolet Triax
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 147 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Triax.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 2000 Chevrolet Triax | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | CTS | Triax |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5664 cc | 660 cc |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1598 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2790 mm |