2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2001 Ford Think
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Think. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Think would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (263 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2001 Ford Think. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Think. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 427 kg more than 2001 Ford Think. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford Think. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (343 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Think. (183 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Think.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 2001 Ford Think | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS | Think |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 183 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2730 mm |