2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2001 Volvo SCC
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Volvo SCC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Volvo SCC would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo SCC (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo SCC should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 337 kg more than 2001 Volvo SCC.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo SCC (285 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (232 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo SCC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS. 2001 Volvo SCC has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo SCC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 2001 Volvo SCC | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | CTS | SCC |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 2521 cc |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 232 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |
