2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2002 Honda Integra
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda Integra would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Honda Integra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2002 Honda Integra has manual transmission. 2002 Honda Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 2002 Honda Integra | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | CTS | Integra |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4374 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1725 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |