2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2002 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Pagani Zonda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Pagani Zonda would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 235 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (307 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 538 kg more than 2002 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 2002 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Cadillac | Pagani |
Model | CTS | Zonda |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 307 HP | 542 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 335 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.6 seconds | 3.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2730 mm |