2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2003 Citroen C3
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C3. (87 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 498 kg more than 2003 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C3. (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C3. 2003 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 2003 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | CTS | C3 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3175 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 77 mm |
Top Speed | 238 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.7 seconds | 14.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1292 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |