2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2003 GMC Yukon

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 4,820 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2003 GMC Yukon. (260 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2003 GMC Yukon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 GMC Yukon weights approximately 624 kg more than 2009 Cadillac CTS.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 GMC Yukon (393 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (370 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2003 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac CTS 2003 GMC Yukon
Make Cadillac GMC
Model CTS Yukon
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3600 cc 4820 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 304 HP 260 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 370 Nm 393 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1638 kg 2262 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 2010 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1930 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2950 mm