2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG TF would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 2003 MG TF. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2003 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (166 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 2003 MG TF | |
Make | Cadillac | MG |
Model | CTS | TF |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 259 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 89.3 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |