2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2003 Mini One
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mini One. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mini One would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 2003 Mini One. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2003 Mini One.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mini One, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mini One. (180 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mini One.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 2003 Mini One | |
Make | Cadillac | Mini |
Model | CTS | One |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 259 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 18.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |