2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2004 Citroen C2
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C2. (123 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 705 kg more than 2004 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (150 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 2004 Citroen C2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
| Model | CTS | C2 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1585 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 232 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 82 mm |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.3 seconds | 8.3 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1083 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 41 L |
