2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2004 Pontiac Montana

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Pontiac Montana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Pontiac Montana would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2004 Pontiac Montana. (185 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Pontiac Montana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 2 kg more than 2004 Pontiac Montana. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Montana, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (370 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Pontiac Montana. (298 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Pontiac Montana.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac CTS 2004 Pontiac Montana
Make Cadillac Pontiac
Model CTS Montana
Year Released 2009 2004
Body Type Sedan Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3599 cc 3498 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 304 HP 185 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 370 Nm 298 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1790 kg 1788 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 5120 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 3050 mm
Fuel Consumption 9.1 L/100km 9.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.8 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 95 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]