2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (256 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 108 kg more than 2004 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (418 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (374 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | CTS | 75 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 307 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 374 Nm | 418 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 224 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.1 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 54 L |