2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2005 GMC Savana
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Savana would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (215 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2005 GMC Savana. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Savana weights approximately 540 kg more than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Savana (353 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (300 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 2005 GMC Savana | |
Make | Cadillac | GMC |
Model | CTS | Savana |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3175 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 2330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 117 L |