2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (191 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | CTS | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5664 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 191 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 72 L |