2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (307 HP) has 97 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 223 kg more than 2009 Cadillac CTS.

Because 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (374 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (345 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac CTS 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
Make Cadillac Mercury
Model CTS Mountaineer
Year Released 2009 2005
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3564 cc 4015 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 307 HP 210 HP
Torque 374 Nm 345 Nm
Engine Bore Size 94 mm 100 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85.6 mm 84 mm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1788 kg 2011 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4860 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1850 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2920 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.1 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 85 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]