2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2005 Pontiac Montana

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Pontiac Montana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Pontiac Montana would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac Montana (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac CTS.

Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Montana, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Pontiac Montana (285 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (232 Nm). This means 2005 Pontiac Montana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS. 2005 Pontiac Montana has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Pontiac Montana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac CTS 2005 Pontiac Montana
Make Cadillac Pontiac
Model CTS Montana
Year Released 2009 2005
Body Type Sedan Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2597 cc 3392 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 179 HP 185 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 232 Nm 285 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1788 kg 1788 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 5120 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2850 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 95 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]