2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Saab 9000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Saab 9000 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 198 kg more than 2005 Saab 9000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (374 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9000. (350 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Saab |
Model | CTS | 9000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2290 cc |
Horse Power | 307 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 374 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1590 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2710 mm |