2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2010 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (215 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 2010 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Cadillac | Daewoo |
| Model | CTS | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3175 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
