2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac CTS would be higher. Both 2009 Cadillac CTS and 2010 Holden UTE are equipped with a 3,600 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (304 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2010 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden UTE.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (370 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE. 2009 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | CTS | UTE |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 304 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 370 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |