2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander

To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander. (166 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 253 kg more than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander. (226 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac CTS 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
Make Cadillac Mitsubishi
Model CTS Outlander
Year Released 2009 2013
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2597 cc 2360 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 16 cylinders
Engine Type V electric
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 179 HP 166 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 232 Nm 226 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4100 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.3 mm 88 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 97 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Diesel / Electric Hybrid
Acceleration 0-100mph 9.3 seconds 9.8 seconds
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1788 kg 1535 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4665 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1680 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2670 mm