2009 Cadillac DTS vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2009 Cadillac DTS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac DTS (271 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac DTS (296 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac DTS | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DTS | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1590 mm |