2009 Cadillac DTS vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Cadillac DTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac DTS (292 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 865 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac DTS (391 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac DTS | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | DTS | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 391 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2160 mm |