2009 Cadillac DTS vs. 1987 Lada Samara
To start off, 2009 Cadillac DTS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac DTS (276 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 710 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac DTS has automatic transmission and 1987 Lada Samara has manual transmission. 1987 Lada Samara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac DTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac DTS | 1987 Lada Samara | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | DTS | Samara |
Year Released | 2009 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 43 L |