2009 Cadillac DTS vs. 1994 Mini MK VI
To start off, 2009 Cadillac DTS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac DTS (271 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1994 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1994 Mini MK VI.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac DTS (296 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mini MK VI. (68 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mini MK VI. 2009 Cadillac DTS has automatic transmission and 1994 Mini MK VI has manual transmission. 1994 Mini MK VI will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac DTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac DTS | 1994 Mini MK VI | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mini |
| Model | DTS | MK VI |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 41 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 68 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1450 mm |
