2009 Cadillac DTS vs. 2005 GMC Safari
To start off, 2009 Cadillac DTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac DTS (271 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2005 GMC Safari. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Safari.
Because 2005 GMC Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac DTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac DTS. (296 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac DTS.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac DTS | 2005 GMC Safari | |
Make | Cadillac | GMC |
Model | DTS | Safari |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1980 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 17 L/100km |