2009 Cadillac DTS vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac DTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac DTS would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac DTS (276 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 2011 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 2011 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 1035 kg more than 2011 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac DTS (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Tata Nano. 2009 Cadillac DTS has automatic transmission and 2011 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2011 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac DTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac DTS | 2011 Tata Nano | |
Make | Cadillac | Tata |
Model | DTS | Nano |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 37 L |