2009 Cadillac DTS vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac DTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac DTS would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 440 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac DTS (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster. 2009 Cadillac DTS has automatic transmission and 2013 Mini Roadster has manual transmission. 2013 Mini Roadster will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac DTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac DTS | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Cadillac | Mini |
Model | DTS | Roadster |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3728 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |