2009 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1956 Saab 92B
To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 92B would be higher. At 6,160 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1003 kg more than 1956 Saab 92B.
Because 2009 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Saab 92B. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1956 Saab 92B has manual transmission. 1956 Saab 92B will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac Escalade | 1956 Saab 92B | |
Make | Cadillac | Saab |
Model | Escalade | 92B |
Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Size | 6160 cc | 763 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 403 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2480 mm |