2009 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1961 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac Escalade. (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac Escalade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 240 kg more than 2009 Cadillac Escalade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac Escalade | 1961 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Escalade | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2009 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5999 cc | 6638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 332 HP | 339 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 50 L |