2009 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1963 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1963 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 209 kg more than 1963 Lincoln Continental. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac Escalade | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
| Model | Escalade | Continental |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6161 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 403 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2609 kg | 2400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3210 mm |
