2009 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1964 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 314 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1075 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac Escalade | 1964 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | Escalade | 2CV |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5999 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 332 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 63 L |